|
|
|
“They painted it again and again until the paintings achieved a deep chiaroscuro, not because of varnishes or anything else, but because the paint could run deep…” - James Rosenquist
I appropriated the name for this website from the above closing words of an interview of American painter James Rosenquist who, in a Vanity Fair article back in April 2003 was commenting on the nature of the painters’ art system centuries ago. In question particularly is the chiaroscuro featured in many icons of art through the centuries. Rosenquist’s belief is of its having been achieved by painting over and over the same images, deleting and adding to the composition until one simply got it right, or, to ones liking. This observation, I believe, bodes well for my work as well, because over the past four years, the paint seems to grow as pliable strata, although not by any scientific or calculated layering (that is, preconceived system of laying paint on as one would accomplish by glazing with transparent colors and gel mediums) but though waiting and observing, and, with an understanding of what the work needs at the very moment the urge to paint arises. I welcome mistakes, with the outlines of those mistakes in relief form; crusted dried pigment ; evidence of the change which has occurred through the painting’s growth.
This is exactly the opposite of working a canvas to a completion over
a period of sittings as I used to do when I first started oil painting
in 1972, where I would always start with a sketch, and then, in a rather
rudimentary order, fill in lights, and then add darks. Finally I would
stuff the thing into a frame and then go on to planning the next work.
Nowadays, I have a minimum of ten to fifteen things working in “beginning”
and “midway” stages of development. In this way there is always
something to work on. . . always fresh ideas moving along . . . |
Chaney, born of deaf mute parents, worked the stage for years before entering the newly born motion picture industry in 1913. from 1913 to 1919 he was in over one hundred films. He was a master at make-up and, consequently, piqued my curiosity and created me to want to become a make-up artist as well. But after three years I learned something,... after three years of collecting and applying different sorts of makeup I learned... even with all the improvements that have been made in the area of special make-up in the past thirty to forty years that no one, but NO ONE could or can accomplish what Chaney did. His world is trapped in celluloid, and the era of his forays a place for dreams... (with all due respect to Jack Pierce, the maestro of so many fine faces from Karloff's Frankenstein in 1931 to Lon Chaney Junior's Wolfman in 1941,... and Dick Smith who is still with us, still teaching, and always astounding. Just look at Little Big Man again, or The Exorcist, or Altered States). Ahem...but I digress... I went to Catholic school up until tenth grade then I switched over to South Philadelphia High because Catholic school had become so expensive, my Mother couldn't afford it, and I wasn't about to work to just put myself through Catholic school... I hated school. My art teacher in SPH was named Milton Feldman, and I would say, he, more than anyone else at the time became my mentor. He was a gentle man, short, with a bald head, gray around the temples and a very gentle smile. He had sensitive eyes and was very quick witted. He used to let me work in the back of the room with a few of the other guys and one girl who were all dedicated to creating like myself. We weren't the types that just sat at their desks and drew what it was he told us was our assignment... we did those too, but we thrived on making marks and so, upon seeing these traits, he came to single us out and left us alone in the back of the room to do whatever it was our little hearts desired. He would come up behind you and start massaging your shoulders, he gave counseling; he took interest in the kids |
. At seventeen I bought my first oil painting set and started painting. The first things I did were landscapes which I quickly painted over...I think one survives and is owned by a neighbor from the street where I grew up in South Philadelphia. I began reading and going to library. Because of my fascination with Horror films I was a regular reader of FAMOUS MONSTERS OF FILMLAND; this was (and has recently been resurrected from the ashes), a magazine that hit newsstands in 1958 following the success of I WAS A TEENAGE WEREWOLF with Michael Landon. The publisher, James Warren and Forrest J Ackerman as editor, put together an entire magazine of pictures and stories about the golden age of horror films. I devoured each and every copy. Not only did the contents fill me with wonder and awe, but the slick full color covers were done by an artist named Basil Gogos (pronounced Go-gesh). His work was the kind of work I immediately wanted to do and so I set out copying his style, that led to my discovery of Frank Frazetta's work on the covers of EERIE AND CREEPY which were magazines which were published by the same company as Famous Monsters. These magazines were cartoon art and the covers were also glossy stock and full color. Along with Frazetta's work, I relished the brush work of Enrich and Sanjulian... (and if anyone knows the whereabouts of either of these artists I'd be interested in knowing)... but it was Frazetta's that captured and portrayed all of what my mind craved and it is quite apparent when you look at my earliest work: PRINCESS, TWILIGHT, ATLANTIAN, DRAGON WITCH, and OGRE and WIZARD, all portray "Pseudo-Frank" which is the term I still use when I look at the covers of comic art magazines and I see so many weak and pale imitations. When I was younger... and here's where I sound like the old fart, right? When I was younger, there were the artists I mentioned above, Frazetta, Enrich and Sanjulian and they all had their OWN style, but as popularity in that field grew and more magazines began to emerge, other lesser artists began to dabble in the creation of bastardization and I did not want to be one of "they" that were being compared to Frazetta. I was on a train going to New York. I was simply
going to arrive and start marching around to places to show my work. I
was going to conquer the market. I was so naive... but I had balls...
up to that point. I chickened out though. I never made it there. I hit
Grand Central and came back. On the way I kept thinking of being called
fake Frazetta... knew my work would be compared to his... and though I
knew deep down inside it was so inferior I couldn't answer whether or
not my work was inferior to the worst of the new breed of imitators. Now
I can say it was by far superior without sounding too egocentric, I hope.Aside
from Frazetta, the single most important influence for me was Salvador
Dali. His work embodied everything. As in Frazetta's work there was the
power of the composition, grace in rendition, space, and acute sexuality.
I worked doing Frazetta-influenced work and would turn around and do something
totally "DALINIAN". LAST
MINUTES of LIFE, THIN
AIR (of the DISCONSERTING KIND), POE:
ALONE,and of
the RESULT of PERIDOXICAL SLEEP, are three existing examples my
work from 1976 -78. There was constant battle to do surrealism...to do
Fantasy art...albeit...the fantastic was what I sought. As 1979 approached
it became my turning point as I had decided if I was going to paint I
had to paint what felt and what I wanted to truly make it MY ART yet influences
were hard to avoid...I became immersed in the visions of Van Gogh...I
laid on the thick paint and painted from my heart like I had never felt
before... even believing his spirit was flowing through me: TIME GONE BY,
SELF PORTRAIT IN ORANGE,
and especially OLD BRUSHES,
signify this possession. Funny, you know a month after
I completed Old Brushes, Leonard Nimoy as in Town at the Walnut Street
Theater here in Philadelphia with the play that he did based on the letters
of Theo to Vincent. It was called "Dear Vincent" in which Nimoy,
with a sparse set, played Vincent and Theo. It was a marvelous event for
me, especially in the use of two large screens onto which slides of Vincent's
paintings were projected throughout the monologues. My friend who was
a schoolteacher took his class and just by coincidence one of the kids
couldn't make it so he had a free ticket. I went eagerly and brought "Old
Brushes" with me wrapped in brown paper. I waited after the presentation
at the ninth street stage door exit, waiting patiently for Nimoy to exit...stood
there with a hoard of Trekkies in Start Trek costume and pointed ears
(this was way before the first (boring) Start Trek movie and so all these
kids were just about creaming their pants to meet "Spock" which
I thought was pretty banal since he was there as an actor though forever
typecast as everyone's favorite Vulcan; and quiet frankly, I didn't want
to be associated with their looming so I hurriedly scribbled a note on
the play bill thanking him for his rendition of Vincent and fixed it to
the string wrap around the painting. I said to the guy at the front of
the line who seemed honest enough: "This is a painting I did, could
you see that Mr. Nimoy gets it?" I placed it by the wall and walked
away. I needed a beer and a smoke. My life was filled with it at the time.
To this day I do not know whether Nimoy has the picture or the guy at
the front of the line clipped it thinking it was a portrait of Spock during
the friggin' "Plak-Tow" (from "Amok Time"). See, I
know my stuff. Was written by Theodore Sturgeon too.But I look at the
photo of this painting and remember painting it in the heat of my studio,
totally immersed...The same is true of MY PORCH,
also from 1978. It's the only painting I've ever painted
outdoors. I came home from the hellish job I had then... working of all
places in a sugarhouse... Domino sugar to be exact...and I set up my easel
and painted what no longer exists.We moved from the house in September
of 1979 on a Friday and that next Tuesday it was leveled. I cried on that
day, for upon that porch all dreams as a child had come to fruition...the
world could be a castle, or a pirate ship...a space ship... there upon
those sunlit bricks childhood still exists...By the end of 1978 my need
for self expression had become and overpowering experience. I painted
PORTRAIT of RICHARD SPECK, ... and a lot of people used to think it was
Mr. Spock! I painted this portrait because I came across his picture for
the first time. I knew of the murders in the sixties. |
| continued
|
|
Copyright © 2005 All rights reserved by Joe L'Erario website designed by: Zahab Design |